Related articles |
---|
The compilation approach in modern languages sgganesh@gmail.com (Ganny) (2005-02-11) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages rbates@southwind.net (Rodney M. Bates) (2005-02-12) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages sgganesh@gmail.com (Ganny) (2005-02-12) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2005-02-13) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages cartazio@gmail.com (Carter Schonwald) (2005-02-13) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2005-02-13) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-02-13) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-02-16) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages boldyrev@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru (Ivan Boldyrev) (2005-02-16) |
[14 later articles] |
From: | "Ganny" <sgganesh@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 12 Feb 2005 17:46:20 -0500 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
References: | 05-02-053 05-02-056 |
Keywords: | design, Java |
Posted-Date: | 12 Feb 2005 17:46:20 EST |
>>It is a common misconception that certain languages are "interpreted"
>>and others are "compiled" In fact, the distinction between compiled
>>and interpreted (and hybrids) is not a property of the language, but
>>only of the implementation.
Also, it is true that languages are designed with particular
implementation approaches in mind. It would be a misconception to think
that C was designed for interpreation approach in mind and Java was
designed with native compilation in mind.
-Ganesh
[I think you'll find that Java was designed to be compiled into
interpreted byte codes, native code via JIT from byte codes, or
directly to native code. C was certainly designed with native code in
mind. =John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.