Related articles |
---|
How to translate a language that runs on JVM? jrefactors@hotmail.com (2005-01-03) |
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? sgganesh@gmail.com (2005-01-09) |
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? holycall@paran.com (Seokwoo Choi) (2005-01-09) |
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? vbdis@aol.com (2005-01-09) |
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? news8573@paulcager.com (Paul Cager) (2005-01-09) |
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? napi@cs.indiana.edu (2005-01-12) |
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-01-12) |
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? pohjalai@cc.helsinki.fi (A Pietu Pohjalainen) (2005-01-12) |
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? caseyh@istar.ca (Casey Hawthorne) (2005-01-14) |
From: | vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 9 Jan 2005 20:49:46 -0500 |
Organization: | AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com |
References: | 05-01-012 |
Keywords: | Java, translator |
Posted-Date: | 09 Jan 2005 20:49:45 EST |
jrefactors@hotmail.com schreibt:
>If we want to write a language translator that translates one language
>to another language (Java Source Code or Byte Code) that runs on JVM,
>which of the following approaches is better?
If your language is sufficiently Java compatible, then a textual
translation into Java may be easier to implement, and certainly is
much easier to debug, due to the readable output.
Otherwise JVM bytecode is equivalent to the machine code produced by
native compilers. The only advantage here is the simplicity of the VM,
that allows to exclude some optimizations that are suggested for other
machines (register allocation...).
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.