Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM?

"Seokwoo Choi" <holycall@paran.com>
9 Jan 2005 20:49:26 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
How to translate a language that runs on JVM? jrefactors@hotmail.com (2005-01-03)
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? sgganesh@gmail.com (2005-01-09)
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? holycall@paran.com (Seokwoo Choi) (2005-01-09)
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? vbdis@aol.com (2005-01-09)
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? news8573@paulcager.com (Paul Cager) (2005-01-09)
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? napi@cs.indiana.edu (2005-01-12)
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-01-12)
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? pohjalai@cc.helsinki.fi (A Pietu Pohjalainen) (2005-01-12)
Re: How to translate a language that runs on JVM? caseyh@istar.ca (Casey Hawthorne) (2005-01-14)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Seokwoo Choi" <holycall@paran.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 9 Jan 2005 20:49:26 -0500
Organization: Korea Research Environment Open Network
References: 05-01-012
Keywords: Java, translator
Posted-Date: 09 Jan 2005 20:49:25 EST

Java language has more restrictions than Java bytecode,
for example control flow commands, method definitions.
But we usually don't use that features and I found them only in obfuscators.
I suggests #2 approach.
Programming will be simpler and can skip one step (java -> bytecode).

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.