Re: Syntax of SmallTalk

Trevor.Jenkins@suneidesis.com (Trevor Jenkins)
25 Dec 2004 20:17:29 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Syntax of SmallTalk kjs@home.nl (Klaas-Jan Stol) (2004-12-23)
Re: Syntax of SmallTalk ogailx502@sneakemail.com (Tim Olson) (2004-12-25)
Re: Syntax of SmallTalk Trevor.Jenkins@suneidesis.com (2004-12-25)
Re: Syntax of SmallTalk peter.ilberg@ni.com (Peter Ilberg) (2004-12-25)
Re: Syntax of SmallTalk nick.roberts@acm.org (Nick Roberts) (2004-12-25)
Re: Syntax of SmallTalk davide.grandi@mclink.it (2004-12-25)
Re: Syntax of SmallTalk lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2005-01-19)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Trevor.Jenkins@suneidesis.com (Trevor Jenkins)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 25 Dec 2004 20:17:29 -0500
Organization: suneidesis
References: 04-12-110
Keywords: smalltalk, parse
Posted-Date: 25 Dec 2004 20:17:29 EST

On 23 Dec 2004 21:36:17 -0500, Klaas-Jan Stol <kjs@home.nl> wrote:


> I'm looking for a *complete* grammar for SmallTalk.


Is that even possible?


Been a long time since I used SmallTalk-80 but I seem to recall that
it was possible to introduce ones own syntactical constructs. Or am I
getting confused with POP-11/poplog-11?


> [Somebody asked 10 years ago and got no answers. so don't hold your
breath. > -John]


Presumably the closest we can get is the material in Goldberg et al's
series of books.


Maybe a look at the Squeak interpreter will reveal some helpful stuff.


Regards, Trevor


<>< Re: deemed!

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.