Related articles |
---|
[20 earlier articles] |
Re: problems with identifiers and keywords... genew@mail.ocis.net (Gene Wirchenko) (2004-11-20) |
Re: problems with identifiers and keywords... david.thompson1@worldnet.att.net (Dave Thompson) (2004-11-28) |
Re: problems with identifiers and keywords... cgweav@aol.com (2004-11-29) |
Re: problems with identifiers and keywords... nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2004-12-01) |
Re: problems with identifiers and keywords... cdc@maxnet.co.nz (Carl Cerecke) (2004-12-01) |
Re: problems with identifiers and keywords... gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2004-12-05) |
Re: problems with identifiers and keywords... vbdis@aol.com (2004-12-05) |
From: | vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 5 Dec 2004 21:33:47 -0500 |
Organization: | AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com |
References: | 04-12-013 |
Keywords: | syntax, design |
Posted-Date: | 05 Dec 2004 21:33:47 EST |
Carl Cerecke <cdc@maxnet.co.nz> schreibt:
>If you then want to describe that language within itself, you need a
>special representation of the NTD. And we are back at square one.
The usual representation is a string containing the glyph, or the name
of the according lexer token, isn't it?
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.