Related articles |
---|
"declarative" language design pros/cons devobject@gmail.com (Dev Object) (2004-12-01) |
Re: "declarative" language design pros/cons torbenm@diku.dk (2004-12-05) |
From: | torbenm@diku.dk (=?iso-8859-1?q?Torben_=C6gidius_Mogensen?=) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 5 Dec 2004 21:33:06 -0500 |
Organization: | Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen |
References: | 04-12-007 |
Keywords: | design |
Posted-Date: | 05 Dec 2004 21:33:06 EST |
Dev Object <devobject@gmail.com> writes:
> I am trying to learn more about "declarative" language design pros/cons
> vis-a-vis "imperative" approach.
>
> Are there are any papers that are recommended reading to better grasp
> the concept and the associated trade-offs in design, complexity of
> translator tools, challenges in grammar design, peformance and
> verification tools ?
I doubt grammar design complexity is influenced by declarative versus
imperative languages.
A few articles/sites that may if interest for some of th eother
points:
John Hughes, "Why Functional Programming Matters",
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/Papers/whyfp.html
Paul Hudak and Mark P. Jones, Haskell vs. Ada vs. C++ vs. Awk vs. ...
An Experiment in Software Prototyping Productivity,
www.cs.pdx.edu/~apt/cs457_2003/hudak-jones.pdf
The Great Computer Language Shootout
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/
Torben
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.