Related articles |
---|
Grammar analysis vbdis@aol.com (2004-11-20) |
Re: Grammar analysis lhp+news@toft-hp.dk (Lasse =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hiller=F8e?= Petersen) (2004-11-26) |
Re: Grammar analysis demakov@ispras.ru (Alexey Demakov) (2004-11-28) |
Re: Grammar analysis vbdis@aol.com (2004-11-29) |
Re: Grammar analysis lhp+news@toft-hp.dk (Lasse =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hiller=F8e?= Petersen) (2004-12-01) |
Re: Grammar analysis vbdis@aol.com (2004-12-01) |
From: | "Lasse =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hiller=F8e?= Petersen" <lhp+news@toft-hp.dk> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 1 Dec 2004 23:15:38 -0500 |
Organization: | No Organization |
References: | 04-11-102 04-11-126 |
Keywords: | parse, practice |
Posted-Date: | 01 Dec 2004 23:15:38 EST |
vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) wrote:
> At least when the computation of a big grammar takes days...
How big would a grammar have to be for that to happen, I wonder?
> Thanks for your hint on "efficient", I'll try to find such qualified
> references myself.
I (well, Google) found this interesting piece in the archive:
http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/01-04-079
Seems it is true what they say about Germans and efficiency. :-)
-Lasse
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.