Related articles |
---|
Grammar analysis vbdis@aol.com (2004-11-20) |
Re: Grammar analysis lhp+news@toft-hp.dk (Lasse =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hiller=F8e?= Petersen) (2004-11-26) |
Re: Grammar analysis demakov@ispras.ru (Alexey Demakov) (2004-11-28) |
Re: Grammar analysis vbdis@aol.com (2004-11-29) |
Re: Grammar analysis lhp+news@toft-hp.dk (Lasse =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hiller=F8e?= Petersen) (2004-12-01) |
Re: Grammar analysis vbdis@aol.com (2004-12-01) |
From: | vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 20 Nov 2004 21:39:51 -0500 |
Organization: | AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com |
Keywords: | parse, question |
Posted-Date: | 20 Nov 2004 21:39:51 EST |
I'm just about to implement an grammar analyzer, and wonder about some
of the algorithms described in the according literature.
The computation of the First and Follow sets is not trivial,
nonetheless I don't understand the "repeat until nothing changes"
loops. Are these abbreviations of otherwise higher order algorithms,
or did I miss newer and more straight algorithms?
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.