Re: target language grammars.

Ken Rose <kenrose@tfb.com>
14 Nov 2004 22:41:31 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
target language grammars. ralphpboland@yahoo.com (2004-11-06)
Re: target language grammars. cppljevans@cox-internet.com (Larry Evans) (2004-11-07)
Re: target language grammars. dobes@dobesland.com (Dobes Vandermeer) (2004-11-07)
Re: target language grammars. lujoplujop@gmail.com (Lujop) (2004-11-07)
Re: target language grammars. vbdis@aol.com (2004-11-07)
Re: target language grammars. cgweav@aol.com (2004-11-07)
Re: target language grammars. kenrose@tfb.com (Ken Rose) (2004-11-14)
Re: target language grammars. idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira Baxter) (2004-11-14)
target language grammars. a.t.hofkamp@tue.nl (A.T. Hofkamp) (2004-11-14)
Re: target language grammars. zbigniew@planet.nl (Zbigniew Chamski) (2004-11-14)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Ken Rose <kenrose@tfb.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 14 Nov 2004 22:41:31 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
References: 04-11-013
Keywords: translator
Posted-Date: 14 Nov 2004 22:41:31 EST

Ralph Boland wrote:
> Does it make sence to make use of a grammar of the target language in
> any way?


I'm not sure if it's directly useful for your problem, but it reminds me
of the BURS-style code generators like iburg and ocamlburg.


    - ken


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.