Related articles |
---|
[7 earlier articles] |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages gmt@CS.Arizona.EDU (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages alexc@TheWorld.com (Alex Colvin) (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages rbates@southwind.net (Rodney M. Bates) (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages cyberlync@gmail.com (cyberlync@gmail.com) (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages victor@eijkhout.net (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira Baxter) (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages kven80918@yeehaw.com (Ed Kornkven) (2004-10-17) |
From: | "Ed Kornkven" <kven80918@yeehaw.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 17 Oct 2004 16:14:11 -0400 |
Organization: | ACS Internet - complaints to abuse@acsalaska.net |
References: | 04-10-073 |
Keywords: | parallel |
Posted-Date: | 17 Oct 2004 16:14:11 EDT |
Hi Neal,
If you want to count research languages, there have been many. If
you're interested in C/C++ in particular, you might take a look at
Unified Parallel C (http://upc.gwu.edu/) or Charm++
(http://charm.cs.uiuc.edu). UPC is implemented by several commercial
vendors and is more similar to OpenMP's paradigm. Charm++ by virtue
of its data-driven programming model is quite a different animal.
BTW, there is a Fortran extension that originated at Cray, CoArray
Fortran, that turns out to be more or less a Fortran analogue to UPC.
Ed Kornkven
PS. There is another thread dealing with languages that have as a
design goal high performance. Explicitly parallel languages would of
course be included in that group.
"Neal Wang" <neal.wang@gmail.com> wrote in message
> Does anyone know any explicit parellel programming languages? C/C++
> and Fortran support OpenMP directives. Any one has tried to extend
> C/C++ grammar to include OpenMP.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.