Related articles |
---|
[4 earlier articles] |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages smidkiff@purdue.edu (2004-10-12) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages m.a.ellis@ncl.ac.uk (Martin Ellis) (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages gmt@CS.Arizona.EDU (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages alexc@TheWorld.com (Alex Colvin) (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages rbates@southwind.net (Rodney M. Bates) (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages cyberlync@gmail.com (cyberlync@gmail.com) (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages victor@eijkhout.net (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira Baxter) (2004-10-17) |
Re: OpenMP and parallel programming languages kven80918@yeehaw.com (Ed Kornkven) (2004-10-17) |
From: | "cyberlync@gmail.com" <cyberlync@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 17 Oct 2004 16:11:46 -0400 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
References: | 04-10-073 |
Keywords: | parallel |
Posted-Date: | 17 Oct 2004 16:11:46 EDT |
The two langauges that exploit this well is Erlang (www.erlang.org) and
Mozart-oz (www.mozart-oz.org). I think they are the two most used
langauges in this group with Erlang being the more mainstream of the
two.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.