Re: performance-oriented languages?

rrr@ieee.org (Rajeev)
17 Oct 2004 16:11:20 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: performance-oriented languages? beliavsky@aol.com (2004-10-02)
Re: performance-oriented languages? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2004-10-04)
Re: performance-oriented languages? barabucc@cs.unibo.it (Gioele Barabucci) (2004-10-04)
Re: performance-oriented languages? dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2004-10-09)
Re: performance-oriented languages? pkk@spth.de (Philipp Klaus Krause) (2004-10-09)
Re: performance-oriented languages? wildstf@hotmail.com (Stefano Lanzavecchia) (2004-10-12)
Re: performance-oriented languages? rrr@ieee.org (2004-10-17)
Re: performance-oriented languages? skaller@nospam.com.au (John Max Skaller) (2004-10-21)
Re: performance-oriented languages? beliavsky@aol.com (2004-10-21)
Re: performance-oriented languages? dberlin@dberlin.org (Daniel Berlin) (2004-10-23)
Re: performance-oriented languages? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2004-10-24)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: rrr@ieee.org (Rajeev)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 17 Oct 2004 16:11:20 -0400
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: 04-10-015 04-10-033
Keywords: design, performance
Posted-Date: 17 Oct 2004 16:11:20 EDT

beliavsky@aol.com wrote in message news:04-10-033...


> Pathscale C/C++/Fortran is marketed based on performance -- see
> http://www.pathscale.com/products1.html .
>
> Portland Group markets "PGIŽ High-Performance [C/C++/Fortran]
> Compilers and Tools" at http://www.pgroup.com/


Any suggestions on where to find real-world (more particularly 3rd
party or disinterested !) comparison experience between these two ?
I'm looking to test some apps on a dual Opteron system and need to
choose a compiler that will provide good support for SIMD(SSE2)
vectorization. IBM has a business arrangement with PathScale but I've
seen their e325 publications listing use of the Portland compiler.


Thanks,


-rajeev-

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.