Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| performance-oriented languages? vanevery@@indiegamedesign.com (Brandon J. Van Every) (2004-10-02) |
| Re: performance-oriented languages? alexvn@big-foot.com (Alex Vinokur) (2004-10-02) |
| Re: performance-oriented languages? beliavsky@aol.com (2004-10-02) |
| Re: performance-oriented languages? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2004-10-04) |
| Re: performance-oriented languages? barabucc@cs.unibo.it (Gioele Barabucci) (2004-10-04) |
| Re: performance-oriented languages? dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2004-10-09) |
| Re: performance-oriented languages? pkk@spth.de (Philipp Klaus Krause) (2004-10-09) |
| Re: performance-oriented languages? wildstf@hotmail.com (Stefano Lanzavecchia) (2004-10-12) |
| [5 later articles] |
| From: | "Alex Vinokur" <alexvn@big-foot.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 2 Oct 2004 16:21:48 -0400 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 04-10-015 |
| Keywords: | performance |
| Posted-Date: | 02 Oct 2004 16:21:48 EDT |
"Brandon J. Van Every" <vanevery@@indiegamedesign.com> wrote
[snip]
> An example might be Mlton, the whole program SML optimizing compiler.
> http://www.mlton.org/ I think Intel C++ would count. VC++ wouldn't,
> it's oriented towards the IDE for .NET stuff, not best possible
> performance. I don't think g++ would count, as given its results in
> recent years it doesn't seem to be a performance-oriented project.
[snip]
Results of Comparative Performance Measurement for C++ Compilers can
be seen at.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/37.
Testsuite: Computing very large Fibonacci numbers.
We can see that g++ 3.3.1 (Mingw) has better performance vs. Intel C++ 8.0.
--
Alex Vinokur
email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com
http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html
http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.