Re: Linking with different compilers

Unknown <tee.teoh@sympatico.ca>
25 Aug 2004 14:54:15 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Linking with different compilers bill.volz@chevrontexaco.com (2004-08-23)
Re: Linking with different compilers ppluzhnikov@charter.net (Paul Pluzhnikov) (2004-08-25)
Re: Linking with different compilers tee.teoh@sympatico.ca (Unknown) (2004-08-25)
Re: Linking with different compilers vidar@hokstad.name (2004-09-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Unknown <tee.teoh@sympatico.ca>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 25 Aug 2004 14:54:15 -0400
Organization: Bell Sympatico
References: 04-08-123
Keywords: linker, practice
Posted-Date: 25 Aug 2004 14:54:15 EDT

I had a similar problem at work not long ago. We ended up convincing
the vendor to recompile with gcc 3.3 after trying fake the
libstdc++.so.3 by symlinking it from libstdc++.so.5. Unfortunately
encountered symbol changes from libstdc++.so.3 to libstdc++.so.5.


I am not sure if you can statically link in the code.


One possible way out of this conundrum is to wrap each library as a
RPC/CORBA server and make method calls between them as needed. I must
admit it is not the nicest of solutions.


Best of luck


tee


On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 12:11:26 -0400, Bill wrote:


> I have some libraries from one vendor that was built with gcc 3.0.2. I
> have another set of libraries from another vendor that was built with
> gcc 3.3.
>
> I need to link a program that uses both libraries. I can get the two
> vendors stuff to link finally, but I'm having trouble with libstdc++
> and libgcc_s. ...

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.