Re: LR (k) vs. LALR

Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net>
23 Aug 2004 12:06:09 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
LR (k) vs. LALR profetas@gmail.com (Profetas) (2004-08-09)
Re: LR (k) vs. LALR tbauer@cadrc.calpoly.edu (Tim Bauer) (2004-08-10)
Re: LR (k) vs. LALR Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org (Colin Paul Gloster) (2004-08-10)
Re: LR (k) vs. LALR jm@bourguet.org (Jean-Marc Bourguet) (2004-08-11)
Re: LR (k) vs. LALR kamalp@acm.org (2004-08-15)
Re: LR (k) vs. LALR clint@0lsen.net (Clint Olsen) (2004-08-23)
Re: LR (k) vs. LALR jeremy.wright@microfocus.com (Jeremy Wright) (2004-08-25)
Re: LR (k) vs. LALR schmitz@i3s.unice.fr (Sylvain Schmitz) (2004-09-03)
Re: LR (k) vs. LALR kamalp@acm.org (2004-09-03)
Re: LR (k) vs. LALR gsc@zip.com.au (Sean Case) (2004-09-07)
Re: LR (k) vs. LALR cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2004-09-07)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 23 Aug 2004 12:06:09 -0400
Organization: Comcast Online
References: 04-08-037 04-08-055 04-08-073 04-08-098
Keywords: parse, yacc
Posted-Date: 23 Aug 2004 12:06:09 EDT

On 2004-08-16, Kamal R. Prasad <kamalp@acm.org> wrote:
>
> By definition -no. Yacc [or its gnu equivalent Bison] does not support
> more than one lookahead.


Newer versions of Bison have support for GLR parsing, which can parse any
context-free grammar.


-Clint


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.