Re: Register allocation

"Rajaram" <rajaram@acmet.com>
4 Aug 2004 02:43:54 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[3 earlier articles]
Re: Register allocation sumesh_uk@hotmail.com (2003-07-21)
Re: Register allocation lindahl@pbm.com (2003-07-21)
Re: Register allocation dany42NOSPAM@free.fr (Dan) (2003-07-21)
Re: Register allocation sumesh_uk@hotmail.com (2003-07-31)
Register allocation avizit@gmail.com (2004-07-15)
Re: Register allocation gopi@sankhya.com (2004-07-28)
Re: Register allocation rajaram@acmet.com (Rajaram) (2004-08-04)
Re: Register allocation kamalp@acm.org (2004-08-05)
Re: Register allocation kym@sdf.lonestar.org (russell kym horsell) (2004-08-09)
Re: Register allocation kamalp@acm.org (2004-08-09)
Re: Register allocation gopi@sankhya.com (2004-08-10)
Re: Register allocation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2004-08-10)
Re: Register allocation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2004-08-10)
[19 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: "Rajaram" <rajaram@acmet.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 4 Aug 2004 02:43:54 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 04-07-044
Keywords: registers

Hi


> Are there any published records of how much improvement ( both in code
> size and run time ) "register allocation" provides?


I think there are many . Anyway checkout


"Register Allocation by Priority-based Coloring" Frederick Chow t and John
Hennessy


It talks about register allocation statistics for benchmark programs(Section
7.1).


Anyway did u google arround !! ;)


RERA



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.