Re: Why are LR parsers faster than using if conditions

"Brandon J. Van Every" <try_vanevery_at_mycompanyname@yahoo.com>
13 Jul 2004 22:17:19 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: Why are LR parsers faster than using if conditions haberg@matematik.su.se (Hans Aberg) (2004-06-28)
Re: Why are LR parsers faster than using if conditions clint@0lsen.net (Clint Olsen) (2004-06-28)
RE: Why are LR parsers faster than using if conditions quinn-j@shaw.ca (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (2004-06-30)
Re: Why are LR parsers faster than using if conditions tmoog@panix.com (2004-06-30)
Re: Why are LR parsers faster than using if conditions haberg@matematik.su.se (Hans Aberg) (2004-06-30)
Re: Why are LR parsers faster than using if conditions christian.bau@cbau.freeserve.co.uk (Christian Bau) (2004-07-11)
Re: Why are LR parsers faster than using if conditions try_vanevery_at_mycompanyname@yahoo.com (Brandon J. Van Every) (2004-07-13)
Re: Why are LR parsers faster than using if conditions paulbmann@yahoo.com (Paul B Mann) (2004-07-28)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Brandon J. Van Every" <try_vanevery_at_mycompanyname@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 13 Jul 2004 22:17:19 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 04-06-122 04-06-126 04-07-004
Keywords: parse, performance
Posted-Date: 13 Jul 2004 22:17:19 EDT

Christian Bau wrote:
>
> And profiling probably prevented inlining - so your actual execution
> times might be much less than you thought.


Non-invasive sampling profilers are available, such as VTune.


--
Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA


On Usenet, if you're not an open source hippie who
likes to download and play with programming toys
all day long, there's something wrong with you.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.