Re: compiler writing as a career?

david.boyle@ed.tadpole.com (Dave Boyle)
21 Jun 2004 23:38:31 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[4 earlier articles]
Re: compiler writing as a career? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2004-06-11)
Re: compiler writing as a career? cgweav@aol.com (2004-06-11)
Re: compiler writing as a career? frido@q-software-solutions.de (Friedrich Dominicus) (2004-06-12)
Re: compiler writing as a career? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2004-06-14)
Re: compiler writing as a career? vanevery@indiegamedesign.com (Brandon J. Van Every) (2004-06-14)
Re: compiler writing as a career? Jeffrey.Kenton@comcast.net (Jeff Kenton) (2004-06-15)
Re: compiler writing as a career? david.boyle@ed.tadpole.com (2004-06-21)
Re: compiler writing as a career? pohjalai@cc.helsinki.fi (A Pietu Pohjalainen) (2004-06-21)
Re: compiler writing as a career? sander@haldjas.folklore.ee (Sander Vesik) (2004-06-25)
Re: compiler writing as a career? algrant@myrealbox.com (2004-06-26)
Re: compiler writing as a career? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2004-06-26)
Re: compiler writing as a career? try_vanevery_at_mycompanyname@yahoo.com (Brandon J. Van Every) (2004-06-26)
Re: compiler writing as a career? Kevin.Andre@pandora.be (Kevin André) (2004-06-28)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: david.boyle@ed.tadpole.com (Dave Boyle)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 21 Jun 2004 23:38:31 -0400
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: 04-06-015 04-06-021 04-06-049
Keywords: jobs, administrivia
Posted-Date: 21 Jun 2004 23:38:31 EDT

Friedrich Dominicus <frido@q-software-solutions.de> wrote


> C# makes probably very much sense to Microsoft. They can tailor that
> language to their Operating systems, and because nearly everyone has
> to deal with Windows, they will need to buy their stuff.


An open source C# compiler also exists for Linux (www.go-mono.com/).


> Another advantage of C# for Microsoft, there is no such thing like a
> standard for that. It seems Microsoft does not like standards not set
> by them ;(.


C# has been standardised by ECMA and I believe an ISO standard is
being aimed at. [ISO adopted the standard over a year ago. -John]


> Just imagine Microsoft was not able/willing to implement
> an ANSI C99 compliant compiler, but they were able to develop a new
> language in that time ....


You might want to check out MS's latest C++ compiler (version 7.1) -
it is highly standard compliant.


I certainly don't mind a healthy dislike of some of Microsoft's
business practices or some of its software, but allowing that dislike
to cloud your thinking about technical issues, like standards
compliance, is unprofessional in my opinion.


Cheers,


Dave


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.