Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter

chris.cranford@tkdsoftware.com (Chris Cranford)
28 Apr 2004 15:20:52 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter chris.cranford@tkdsoftware.com (2004-04-15)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter tdk@thelbane.com (Timothy Knox) (2004-04-21)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter bonzini@gnu.org (2004-04-21)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2004-04-21)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter alex@iliasov.org (2004-04-21)
Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter chris.cranford@tkdsoftware.com (2004-04-21)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter chris.cranford@tkdsoftware.com (2004-04-28)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter chris.cranford@tkdsoftware.com (2004-04-28)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter kenrose@tfb.com (Ken Rose) (2004-04-28)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter freitag@alancoxonachip.com (Andi Kleen) (2004-04-28)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter arargh404@NOW.AT.arargh.com (2004-04-29)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter alex_mcd@btopenworld.com (Alex McDonald) (2004-05-02)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter thp@cs.ucr.edu (2004-05-08)
Re: Basic-Like PCODE Compiler and Virtual Host/Interpreter Postmaster@paul.washington.dc.us (Paul Robinson) (2004-05-24)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: chris.cranford@tkdsoftware.com (Chris Cranford)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 28 Apr 2004 15:20:52 -0400
Organization: TKD Software, Inc.
References: 04-04-075
Keywords: interpreter
Posted-Date: 28 Apr 2004 15:20:52 EDT

On 4/21/2004 7:27 AM, LEX@CC.GATECH.EDU wrote to ALL:


-> On the whole, it would be a huge time savings if you can reuse an
-> existing language, possibly with some custom modifications.
-> Developing a language is highly error prone to begin with, and writing
-> interpreters and compilers from scratch tends to take far longer than
-> people expect.


Understood, but its something I'm finding that is fun and interesting to
do ... guess that is why I want to continue down the path.


-> If your users are not good programmers, then this sounds like a lot of
-> computer expertise is being required. Have you put any thought into
-> having dialogs in the application ot help with the program entry?


Its really going to be geared more toward providing flexibility and a way
end users can customize the base product without us recompiling a special
copy for each special needs client.


Thanks,
Chris


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.