Re: Reentrant flex & bison

Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net>
19 Mar 2004 23:50:17 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Reentrant flex & bison cherico@bonbon.net (2004-03-15)
Re: Reentrant flex & bison clint@0lsen.net (Clint Olsen) (2004-03-19)
Re: Reentrant flex & bison bonzini@gnu.org (2004-03-19)
Re: Reentrant flex & bison cherico@bonbon.net (2004-03-26)
Re: Reentrant flex & bison haberg@matematik.su.se (2004-04-03)
Re: Reentrant flex & bison eggert@twinsun.com (Paul Eggert) (2004-04-03)
Re: Reentrant flex & bison bonzini@gnu.org (2004-04-03)
Re: Reentrant flex & bison indradeep_saha@rediffmail.com (2004-04-14)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 19 Mar 2004 23:50:17 -0500
Organization: Comcast Online
References: 04-03-068
Keywords: lex
Posted-Date: 19 Mar 2004 23:50:17 EST

On 2004-03-15, cherico <cherico@bonbon.net> wrote:
> Anybody knows what the way to "glue" them (scanner & parser)
> together is. flex and bison doesn't seem to co-work well
> in this way, right?!
> [Right. The C++ reentrant lex scanner doesn't talk to the
> reentrant C bison parser. -John]


There has been a reentrant version of flex for ANSI C for some time. See
http://lex.sf.net.


-Clint

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.