Related articles |
---|
Limit of 255 superclasses too low? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2003-11-21) |
Re: Limit of 255 superclasses too low? d699rb302@sneakemail.com (Tim Olson) (2003-12-03) |
Re: Limit of 255 superclasses too low? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2003-12-03) |
Re: Limit of 255 superclasses too low? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-02-13) |
Re: Limit of 255 superclasses too low? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-02-13) |
Re: Limit of 255 superclasses too low? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2004-02-26) |
From: | Uli Kusterer <witness@t-online.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 13 Feb 2004 23:56:25 -0500 |
Organization: | T-Online |
References: | 03-11-075 03-12-013 |
Keywords: | OOP |
Posted-Date: | 13 Feb 2004 23:56:25 EST |
Tim Olson <d699rb302@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> Uli Kusterer <witness@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> | does any of you have a project (*any* project) where you have a class
> | that has more than 255 superclasses? I.e.
>
> I just measured the Squeak smalltalk system: with 2725 classes the
> maximum class tree depth was 16.
Tim,
Sorry for the delay in reply. I must have accidentally marked the
message as read.
Thanks for the hands-on info. Smalltalk is probably one of the better
designed libraries (at least that's what I heard), so I guess they don't
have excessively many classes, but even ten times as many classes is
still well within the 255 limit, so I guess my assumption may hold true
for a couple more years (*knocks on wood*).
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
http://www.zathras.de
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.