Re: Limit of 255 superclasses too low?

Uli Kusterer <witness@t-online.de>
13 Feb 2004 23:56:25 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Limit of 255 superclasses too low? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2003-11-21)
Re: Limit of 255 superclasses too low? d699rb302@sneakemail.com (Tim Olson) (2003-12-03)
Re: Limit of 255 superclasses too low? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2003-12-03)
Re: Limit of 255 superclasses too low? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-02-13)
Re: Limit of 255 superclasses too low? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-02-13)
Re: Limit of 255 superclasses too low? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2004-02-26)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Uli Kusterer <witness@t-online.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 13 Feb 2004 23:56:25 -0500
Organization: T-Online
References: 03-11-075 03-12-013
Keywords: OOP
Posted-Date: 13 Feb 2004 23:56:25 EST

  Tim Olson <d699rb302@sneakemail.com> wrote:


> Uli Kusterer <witness@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> | does any of you have a project (*any* project) where you have a class
> | that has more than 255 superclasses? I.e.
>
> I just measured the Squeak smalltalk system: with 2725 classes the
> maximum class tree depth was 16.


Tim,


  Sorry for the delay in reply. I must have accidentally marked the
message as read.


  Thanks for the hands-on info. Smalltalk is probably one of the better
designed libraries (at least that's what I heard), so I guess they don't
have excessively many classes, but even ten times as many classes is
still well within the 255 limit, so I guess my assumption may hold true
for a couple more years (*knocks on wood*).


Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
http://www.zathras.de


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.