Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++

Joel Dillon <jo@spiffy.ox.compsoc.net>
13 Feb 2004 23:51:08 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[3 earlier articles]
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ jo@spiffy.ox.compsoc.net (Joel Dillon) (2004-02-01)
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ vbdis@aol.com (2004-02-01)
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ dezakin@usa.net (2004-02-01)
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ vbdis@aol.com (2004-02-04)
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ hkaiser@users.sourceforge.net (2004-02-12)
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ jakacki@hotmail.com (2004-02-12)
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ jo@spiffy.ox.compsoc.net (Joel Dillon) (2004-02-13)
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ vbdis@aol.com (2004-02-26)
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ walter@digitalmars.com (Walter) (2004-02-26)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Joel Dillon <jo@spiffy.ox.compsoc.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 13 Feb 2004 23:51:08 -0500
Organization: Oxford University Computer Society
References: 04-01-146 04-02-008 04-02-110
Keywords: C++
Posted-Date: 13 Feb 2004 23:51:08 EST

Grzegorz Jakacki <jakacki@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Joel Dillon <jo@spiffy.ox.compsoc.net> wrote
>> I'm playing with writing a compiler; I ripped the parser and lexer out
>> of OpenC++ ( http://opencxx.sourceforge.net ). I'd be happy to talk to you
>> about it in more detail if you can provide me with an email address
>> that actually works; dezakin@usa.net bounces :)


> Why don't you guys join OpenC++ and invest you compiler writing hunger into
> making its lexer/parser more modular and standard compliant?


> If you are interested in preproc, take look at the latest version of Wave.


    Well, because I personally am interested in backend/code-generation
type issues, and OpenC++ is not a compiler, per se, but a source-to-source
translator. I leave all the boring parser work to the OpenC++ folks ;)


--


      Jo


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.