Re: Detecting endless recursion?

Ken Rose <kenrose@tfb.com>
12 Feb 2004 11:03:34 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[23 earlier articles]
Re: Detecting endless recursion? bear@sonic.net (Ray Dillinger) (2004-02-04)
Re: Detecting endless recursion? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2004-02-04)
Re: Detecting endless recursion? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-02-04)
Re: Detecting endless recursion? joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2004-02-08)
Re: Detecting endless recursion? alexc@std.com (Alex Colvin) (2004-02-08)
Re: Detecting endless recursion? cymric73@hotmail.com (Maarten D. de Jong) (2004-02-08)
Re: Detecting endless recursion? kenrose@tfb.com (Ken Rose) (2004-02-12)
Re: Detecting endless recursion? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-02-13)
Re: Detecting endless recursion? joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2004-02-26)
Re: Detecting endless recursion? lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2004-02-26)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Ken Rose <kenrose@tfb.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 12 Feb 2004 11:03:34 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
References: 04-01-050 04-01-086 04-01-119 04-01-123 04-01-149 04-02-034 04-02-040 04-02-081
Keywords: debug
Posted-Date: 12 Feb 2004 11:03:34 EST

Alex Colvin wrote:


> I suppose I really want a reverse execution facility for debugging.


The Objective Caml debugger can do that (http://www.ocaml.org), and a
very handy thing it is, too.


    - ken



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.