Related articles |
---|
[23 earlier articles] |
Re: Detecting endless recursion? bear@sonic.net (Ray Dillinger) (2004-02-04) |
Re: Detecting endless recursion? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2004-02-04) |
Re: Detecting endless recursion? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-02-04) |
Re: Detecting endless recursion? joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2004-02-08) |
Re: Detecting endless recursion? alexc@std.com (Alex Colvin) (2004-02-08) |
Re: Detecting endless recursion? cymric73@hotmail.com (Maarten D. de Jong) (2004-02-08) |
Re: Detecting endless recursion? kenrose@tfb.com (Ken Rose) (2004-02-12) |
Re: Detecting endless recursion? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-02-13) |
Re: Detecting endless recursion? joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2004-02-26) |
Re: Detecting endless recursion? lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2004-02-26) |
From: | Ken Rose <kenrose@tfb.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 12 Feb 2004 11:03:34 -0500 |
Organization: | Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com |
References: | 04-01-050 04-01-086 04-01-119 04-01-123 04-01-149 04-02-034 04-02-040 04-02-081 |
Keywords: | debug |
Posted-Date: | 12 Feb 2004 11:03:34 EST |
Alex Colvin wrote:
> I suppose I really want a reverse execution facility for debugging.
The Objective Caml debugger can do that (http://www.ocaml.org), and a
very handy thing it is, too.
- ken
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.