Re: Quick way to recognize grammar type

"Tim Bauer" <tbauer@cadrc.calpoly.edu>
8 Feb 2004 22:09:48 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Quick way to recognize grammar type srivatsar@yahoo.com (2004-02-01)
Re: Quick way to recognize grammar type haberg@matematik.su.se (2004-02-04)
Re: Quick way to recognize grammar type joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2004-02-04)
Re: Quick way to recognize grammar type cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2004-02-04)
Re: Quick way to recognize grammar type scavadini@ucse.edu.ar (2004-02-08)
Re: Quick way to recognize grammar type tbauer@cadrc.calpoly.edu (Tim Bauer) (2004-02-08)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Tim Bauer" <tbauer@cadrc.calpoly.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 8 Feb 2004 22:09:48 -0500
Organization: Cal Poly, SLO
References: 04-02-014 04-02-049
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 08 Feb 2004 22:09:48 EST

> Not sure about the differences between LR and LALR; I recall dimly
> that LALR and LR are essentially the same, but I might be totally
> wrong with that.


There are grammars that are LR that are not LALR, however, these occur
infrequently. Otherwise, these very similar.


Cheers,
- Tim

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.