Related articles |
---|
Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ dezakin@usa.net (2004-01-22) |
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ david.boyle@ed.tadpole.com (2004-01-31) |
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ haberg@matematik.su.se (2004-02-01) |
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ jo@spiffy.ox.compsoc.net (Joel Dillon) (2004-02-01) |
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ vbdis@aol.com (2004-02-01) |
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ dezakin@usa.net (2004-02-01) |
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ vbdis@aol.com (2004-02-04) |
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ hkaiser@users.sourceforge.net (2004-02-12) |
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ jakacki@hotmail.com (2004-02-12) |
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ jo@spiffy.ox.compsoc.net (Joel Dillon) (2004-02-13) |
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ vbdis@aol.com (2004-02-26) |
Re: Writing a C/C++ compiler in C++ walter@digitalmars.com (Walter) (2004-02-26) |
From: | dezakin@usa.net (Dez Akin) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 1 Feb 2004 12:59:29 -0500 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
References: | 04-01-146 04-01-151 |
Keywords: | C++ |
Posted-Date: | 01 Feb 2004 12:59:29 EST |
david.boyle@ed.tadpole.com (Dave Boyle) wrote
> dezakin@usa.net (Dez Akin) wrote
> > I've been thinking of writing a C++ compiler in C++ over the next
> > several years, and I was wondering what's changed in writing a
> > compiler?
>
> <snip>
>
> Just a word of warning. Walter Bright, who implemented an early C++
> compiler, had this to say in comp.lang.c++.moderated recently:
>
> "I'd venture that it would take 10 years to write a C++ compiler from
> scratch."
>
> He was talking specifically about a fully standard compliant compiler.
>
> This still seems a little excessive to me but I don't have the
> compiler construction experience that Walter has, so...
>
> I'd strongly recommend two books to help in your endeavour:
>
> Engineering a Compiler - Keith Cooper & Linda Torczon
> The C++ Standard - Hardback copy available from The British Standards
> Institute for a reasonable price (about £35).
>
> The first book is a compiler book that is very pragmatic in its
> approach and I think is one of the best compiler books to come out in
> years. I bought it as a result of others in this NG recommending it
> and wasn't disappointed.
>
> Hope this helps.
Quite a bit. It seems the parser itself will be substantially less
work than I orignally thought; Someone at Boost is probably allready
working on the C++ parser, as there already is a fully compliant
preprocessor/lexer.
I've been reading Engineering a Compiler for the last week, and it is
the best compiler book I've looked at; Far better than the dragon
book. So basically I need I need to wrap my head around the context
sensitive analysis and then code generation.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.