Re: What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)?

Oliver Zeigermann <oliver@zeigermann.de>
22 Jan 2004 23:13:26 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)? oliver@zeigermann.de (Oliver Zeigermann) (2004-01-07)
Re: What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)? oliver@zeigermann.de (Oliver Zeigermann) (2004-01-12)
Re: What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2004-01-12)
Re: What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)? oliver@zeigermann.de (Oliver Zeigermann) (2004-01-16)
Re: What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)? cgweav@aol.com (2004-01-16)
Re: What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)? cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2004-01-17)
Re: What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)? oliver@zeigermann.de (Oliver Zeigermann) (2004-01-22)
Re: What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)? oliver@zeigermann.de (Oliver Zeigermann) (2004-01-22)
Re: What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)? oliver@zeigermann.de (Oliver Zeigermann) (2004-02-01)
Re: What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)? cgweav@aol.com (2004-02-04)
Re: What is the trick of languages being LL(k+1), but not LL(k)? cgweav@aol.com (2004-04-15)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Oliver Zeigermann <oliver@zeigermann.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 22 Jan 2004 23:13:26 -0500
Organization: T-Online
References: 04-01-062 04-01-098
Keywords: parse, LL(1)
Posted-Date: 22 Jan 2004 23:13:25 EST

Clayton Weaver wrote:
> Do you mean "the Hopkins reason"?
> (<http://www.uwm.edu/~whopkins/cs/CompFAQ.txt>


Even though in a private conversation Clayton gave me some hints, this
still occurs quite weird to me. I think if I could make any sense of it
it would be really interesting. Does anyone else have any experience
with seeing parsing and formal languages as algebraic systems?


Cheers,


Oliver

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.