|RE: 90/10 rule... source? firstname.lastname@example.org (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (2004-01-09)|
|RE: 90/10 rule... source? email@example.com (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (2004-01-12)|
|Re: 90/10 rule... source? firstname.lastname@example.org (2004-01-16)|
|Re: 90/10 rule... source? email@example.com (2004-01-22)|
|From:||Quinn Tyler Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||9 Jan 2004 23:51:54 -0500|
|Posted-Date:||09 Jan 2004 23:51:54 EST|
> [That's probably the one you want. It was the first to use the term
> program profiling, and it was big news at the time how much of a
> speedup you could get by rewriting tiny bits of a program if it was
> the right tiny bits. It's reprinted in Knuth's new "Selected Papers
> on Computer Languages", ISBN 1575863820. -John]
I've wondered if there are any other* parser generators out there that can
profile at the production level.
Quinn Tyler Jackson
* I say "other" because Meta-S does this.
[I think I've seen a profiling version of yacc, but it was a long time
ago. Unless a compiler does a great deal of analysis and
optimization, the lexer is usually the part of the program that eats
up the most time. I don't ever recall a parser that took much of the
overall runtime. -John]
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.