How to resolve ambiguity?

idht@yahoo.com (Igor)
27 Dec 2003 15:02:36 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
How to resolve ambiguity? idht@yahoo.com (2003-12-27)
Re: How to resolve ambiguity? snicol@apk.net (Scott Nicol) (2004-01-02)
Re: How to resolve ambiguity? derkgwen@HotPOP.com (Derk Gwen) (2004-01-02)
Re: How to resolve ambiguity? snicol@apk.net (Scott Nicol) (2004-01-02)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: idht@yahoo.com (Igor)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 27 Dec 2003 15:02:36 -0500
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Keywords: parse, question
Posted-Date: 27 Dec 2003 15:02:36 EST

Hi,


  I am trying to write a custom compiler for C sharp,
but I am kind of stuck with the grammar MSDN provides,
for example, in the rule:


<struct-type> ::= <type-name>
                                                          | <simple-type>


<type-name> would reduce to <struct-type>,
and in


<class-type> ::= <type-name>
                                                          | object
                                                          | string


  <type-name> would reduce to <class-type>.
THis is evidently a reduce-reduce conflict.


  Could somebody explain why they provide a grammar like that
and how my parser-compiler is supposed to handle that
to not be ambiguous?


Please help, or direct me to the right location
Thank you very much


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.