Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Precedence based parsing Jeffrey.Kenton@comcast.net (Jeff Kenton) (2003-12-03) |
| Re: Precedence based parsing torbenm@diku.dk (2003-12-08) |
| Re: Precedence based parsing jmcenerney@austin.rr.com (John McEnerney) (2003-12-08) |
| Re: Precedence based parsing haberg@matematik.su.se (2003-12-08) |
| Re: Precedence based parsing freitag@alancoxonachip.com (Andi Kleen) (2003-12-08) |
| Re: Precedence based parsing toby@telegraphics.com.au (2003-12-13) |
| Re: Precedence based parsing robert.thorpe@antenova.com (Rob Thorpe) (2003-12-13) |
| Re: Precedence based parsing clint@0lsen.net (Clint Olsen) (2003-12-20) |
| Re: Precedence based parsing sjmeyer@www.tdl.com (Steve Meyer) (2003-12-23) |
| Re: Precedence based parsing joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-12-27) |
| Re: Precedence based parsing haberg@matematik.su.se (2003-12-27) |
| Re: Precedence based parsing derkgwen@HotPOP.com (Derk Gwen) (2004-01-02) |
| From: | Rob Thorpe <robert.thorpe@antenova.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 13 Dec 2003 21:07:00 -0500 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 03-12-035 03-12-056 |
| Keywords: | parse |
| Posted-Date: | 13 Dec 2003 21:07:00 EST |
> Some reasons operator precedence parsing has disappeared from modern
> textbooks (it went away between the Aho & Ullman and the Aho, Sethi &
> Ullman versions of "The Dragon Book") are:
No, it's mentioned in Aho, Sethi and Ullman. I'm sure thats where I
learnt it.
Also, as I understand it, in the past precedence parsers were used to
deal with the mathematical expressions in larger parsers. Especially
where the larger parser was top-down. This was done to make the
parser faster, but today a top-down parser is normally fast enough
anyway when you can use one.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.