Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS

vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
8 Dec 2003 00:28:32 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Pushes, Pops, NOPS vbjohny@yahoo.com (2003-12-03)
Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS Barak.Zalstein@ParthusCeva.com (Barak Zalstein) (2003-12-08)
Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS tmk@netvision.net.il (2003-12-08)
Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS nick.roberts@acm.org (Nick Roberts) (2003-12-08)
Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS kenrose@tfb.com (Ken Rose) (2003-12-08)
Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS vbdis@aol.com (2003-12-08)
Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2003-12-13)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 8 Dec 2003 00:28:32 -0500
Organization: AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com
References: 03-12-032
Keywords: code, optimize
Posted-Date: 08 Dec 2003 00:28:32 EST

vbjohny@yahoo.com (Kalyan) schreibt:


>Could anyone please tell me if there are any freeware
>or shareware assembler or compiler tools that would eliminate these
>unnecessary instructions?


IMO a simple script would allow to remove NOPs and superfluous PUSH/POP
sequences from the assembler source. A good compiler wouldn't produce such
(sequences of) instructions at all; what's the reason why you have to edit the
assembly code manually? And why insert NOPs, are you paid by code lines? <gd&r>


DoDi


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.