Re: OOP Runtime data structures

Markus.Elfring@web.de (Markus Elfring)
27 Oct 2003 16:12:44 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
OOP Runtime data structures witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2003-10-13)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures jones@cs.ua.edu (Joel Jones) (2003-10-13)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures me@junk.address.com (Tim Owen) (2003-10-13)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2003-10-19)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures Markus.Elfring@web.de (2003-10-27)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures Markus.Elfring@web.de (2003-10-27)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures javadesigner@yahoo.com (javadesigner) (2003-10-31)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2003-10-31)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures davide.grandi@mclink.it (2003-10-31)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2003-11-02)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Markus.Elfring@web.de (Markus Elfring)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 27 Oct 2003 16:12:44 -0500
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: 03-10-059
Keywords: OOP, design
Posted-Date: 27 Oct 2003 16:12:44 EST

> 1) I don't intend to differentiate between classes and objects. That
> is, a class can be used just like any other object, and any object can
> be subclassed. I also want method invocations to be messages, so any
> object that responds to the same messages as another can be used in
> the other's place, like in Objective C or Smalltalk.


How do you think about the implementation details for "Extended Object
Tcl" (http://XOTcl.org/)?
Are the informations from the document "Message Redirector"
(http://nm.wu-wien.ac.at/research/publications/mr.pdf) useful for you?

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.