Re: OOP Runtime data structures

Uli Kusterer <witness@t-online.de>
19 Oct 2003 16:03:10 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
OOP Runtime data structures witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2003-10-13)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures jones@cs.ua.edu (Joel Jones) (2003-10-13)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures me@junk.address.com (Tim Owen) (2003-10-13)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2003-10-19)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures Markus.Elfring@web.de (2003-10-27)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures Markus.Elfring@web.de (2003-10-27)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures javadesigner@yahoo.com (javadesigner) (2003-10-31)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2003-10-31)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures davide.grandi@mclink.it (2003-10-31)
Re: OOP Runtime data structures witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2003-11-02)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Uli Kusterer <witness@t-online.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 19 Oct 2003 16:03:10 -0400
Organization: T-Online
References: 03-10-059 03-10-075
Keywords: OOP
Posted-Date: 19 Oct 2003 16:03:10 EDT

Tim Owen <me@junk.address.com> wrote:


> It might be useful to look at the implementation of Smalltalk, and
> perhaps Self, Sather and Cecil (one or more of these sound similar
> to your language).


Thanks. I came across "Self", but completely forgot about Smalltalk,
and never heard of the other two.


> [The implementation of Smalltalk-80 was described in detail in a three
> book set by Goldberg et al. that's been out of print for ages but is widely
> available in libraries and at used bookstores. -John]


  Guess I'll have to get my library card extended :-)


Thanks that should get me started,
-- Uli

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.