Related articles |
---|
malignant closure remnant rkrayhawk@aol.com (2003-10-08) |
Re: malignant closure remnant joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-10-12) |
From: | rkrayhawk@aol.com (RKRayhawk) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 8 Oct 2003 22:26:35 -0400 |
Organization: | AOL http://www.aol.com |
Keywords: | design |
Posted-Date: | 08 Oct 2003 22:26:35 EDT |
I have some questions and I encourage discussion, as follows:
1) Is an active attachment a closure?
2) Is a reference to an active attachment a closure?
3) When productivity software services or email presentation
services receive a reference to an active attachment is that
a closure?
Considering the possible application of the term closure to
an active attachment:
4) In general, how do we protect that which is outside of a
closure from what is in it?
5) Assuming that a closure is capable of leaving behind a remnant.
In general, how do we protect that which is outside of the closure
remnant from the closure remnant?
6) Is it useful to suggest the term malignant closure?
7) Is the term malignant closure remnant useful?
8) Can we extend the vocabulary of the science of garbage collection
to designate the notion of closure remnant capture and cleanup?
Your comments are welcomed.
Best Wishes,
Bob Rayhawk
RKRayhawk@aol.com
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.