Comparative studies of Generalized LR and LL parsing?

"Kunle Odutola" <noemails@replyToTheGroup.nospam.org>
4 Oct 2003 14:48:18 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Comparative studies of Generalized LR and LL parsing? noemails@replyToTheGroup.nospam.org (Kunle Odutola) (2003-10-04)
Re: Comparative studies of Generalized LR and LL parsing? daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (2003-10-06)
Re: Comparative studies of Generalized LR and LL parsing? haberg@matematik.su.se (2003-10-06)
Re: Comparative studies of Generalized LR and LL parsing? cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2003-10-06)
Re: Comparative studies of Generalized LR and LL parsing? oliver@zeigermann.de (Oliver Zeigermann) (2003-10-27)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Kunle Odutola" <noemails@replyToTheGroup.nospam.org>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 4 Oct 2003 14:48:18 -0400
Organization: BT Openworld
Keywords: parse, question, theory
Posted-Date: 04 Oct 2003 14:48:18 EDT

Hi,


There has been a steady increase in the numbers of references to (and
implementations of) "Generalized LR" or GLR parsing but virtually none
for "Generalized LL" or GLL parsing. I'm left wondering if this is
just a reflection of the original decision to bundle YACC with Unix.


Is there such a thing as "Generalized LL" parsing and, have there been
any useful comparisons of "Generalized LR" and "Generalized LL"
parsing?.


Kunle

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.