Re: Bison: reentrant C++ abstract-syntax-tree parser

Lucian Wischik <lu.nn@wischik.com>
27 Sep 2003 13:57:34 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Bison: reentrant C++ abstract-syntax-tree parser lu.nn@wischik.com (Lucian Wischik) (2003-09-23)
Re: Bison: reentrant C++ abstract-syntax-tree parser haberg@matematik.su.se (2003-09-27)
Re: Bison: reentrant C++ abstract-syntax-tree parser lu.nn@wischik.com (Lucian Wischik) (2003-09-27)
Re: Bison: reentrant C++ abstract-syntax-tree parser yves@news.be (Yves Deweerdt) (2003-09-27)
Re: Bison: reentrant C++ abstract-syntax-tree parser luca.dattila@tin.it (Luca D'Attila) (2003-09-27)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Lucian Wischik <lu.nn@wischik.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 27 Sep 2003 13:57:34 -0400
Organization: University of Bologna
References: 03-09-085
Keywords: yacc, C++
Posted-Date: 27 Sep 2003 13:57:34 EDT

Lucian Wischik <lu.nn@wischik.com> wrote:
>I'm trying to use bison to make an abstract syntax tree. I'm trying to
>do it in a nice C++ sort of way. But I'm finding it very difficult,
>and would really find it helpful if someone could point me to an
>example of "best practice".


It's not "best practice", but at least it's a working example...
    http://www.wischik.com/lu/programmer/re-ast.html
This page has an explanatory article as well as the source code. If
anyone has any feedback, I'd love to hear it! (email addr at the top
of that page).


--
Lucian

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.