Bytecode an intermediate language?

rajnichugh@yahoo.com (Rajni)
14 Sep 2003 17:05:31 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Bytecode an intermediate language? rajnichugh@yahoo.com (2003-09-14)
Re: Bytecode an intermediate language? rajnichugh@yahoo.com (2003-09-23)
Re: Bytecode an intermediate language? rkrayhawk@aol.com (2003-09-27)
Re: Bytecode an intermediate language? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2003-09-27)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: rajnichugh@yahoo.com (Rajni)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 14 Sep 2003 17:05:31 -0400
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Keywords: interpreter, question
Posted-Date: 14 Sep 2003 17:05:31 EDT

I am contructing a C compiler as student project. I am not sure
whether bytecode is an intermediate language just like three-address
code or abstract syntax trees. Which intermediate language should be
preferred if I want minimal effort in porting the compiler on
different machines. Does bytecode help in a better way.


Thanks
[When I do bytecode, I generally use a string of reverse polish
operators so I can interpret it with a single simple value stack.
-John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.