Related articles |
---|
Truth Table Implementation shibu_baby@yahoo.com (2003-08-23) |
Re: Truth Table Implementation roadieroger@earthlink.net (2003-08-30) |
Re: Truth Table Implementation tmk@netvision.net.il (2003-09-01) |
Re: Truth Table Implementation Mario.Trams@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de (Mario Trams) (2003-09-04) |
From: | Mario Trams <Mario.Trams@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers,sci.logic,comp.lang.vhdl |
Followup-To: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 4 Sep 2003 01:09:11 -0400 |
Organization: | TU Chemnitz |
References: | 03-08-081 |
Keywords: | practice |
Posted-Date: | 04 Sep 2003 01:09:10 EDT |
shibu wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have several truth tables like the following
>
> I/P1 I/P2 I/P3 I/P4 => O/P1, I/P1 I/P2 I/P3 => O/P1 O/P2, I/P1 I/P2
> I/P3 => O/P1 O/P2 O/P3 etc.
>
> I need to implement this as C code. What is the best way to implement
> this. I know SOP/POS will help me to simplify the truth tables.Is
> there any alternative way to solve this. Any generic/optimized way to
> solve this?
> Is there any lookup ideas to help me, so that I can say "N" Inputs and
> "Y" outputs...
Using a lookup table for speed-optimization or a language description
(i.e. boolean logic coding) for size-optimization ???
Regards,
Mario
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.