Related articles |
---|
Compiler writers will love this language ericmuttta@email.com (2003-05-29) |
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-07-13) |
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language mwotton@cse.unsw.edu.au (2003-07-13) |
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language mwotton@cse.unsw.edu.au (2003-07-13) |
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language haberg@matematik.su.se (2003-07-17) |
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language waxlex@yahoo.co.uk (ikhnos) (2003-07-21) |
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-07-31) |
From: | nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (Nick Maclaren) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 31 Jul 2003 12:40:53 -0400 |
Organization: | University of Cambridge, England |
References: | 03-05-211 03-07-118 |
Keywords: | GC |
Posted-Date: | 31 Jul 2003 12:40:53 EDT |
haberg@matematik.su.se (Hans Aberg) writes:
|> nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (Nick Maclaren) wrote:
|>
|> >|> I don't believe anyone has ever fixed the cyclic graph problem with
|> >|> reference-counting.
|> >
|> >As it is theoretically impossible to fix, that seems likely :-)
|>
|> It is not impossible to make versions (but not pure ref count) that can
|> trace cyclicity in some circumstances:
Yes, indeed. The theoretical impossibility is for the general case,
as usual.
|> If one should get around this dynamically created cycles problem, perhaps
|> one ends up on essentially a tracing algorithm.
It could well be. The papers I have seen 'solve' the problem have
handled only the static case.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.