Related articles |
---|
A microcontroller-centric, target-neutral programming language petegray@ieee.org (Pete Gray) (2003-07-15) |
Re: A microcontroller-centric, target-neutral programming language me@here.org (Juan Lauda) (2003-07-21) |
Re: A microcontroller-centric, target-neutral programming language jan.homuth@altium.com (Jan Homuth) (2003-07-21) |
Re: A microcontroller-centric, target-neutral programming language mark.piffer@chello.at (2003-07-21) |
Re: A microcontroller-centric, target-neutral programming language jkirwan@easystreet.com (Jonathan Kirwan) (2003-07-23) |
From: | "Juan Lauda" <me@here.org> |
Newsgroups: | comp.arch.embedded,comp.compilers |
Date: | 21 Jul 2003 21:32:24 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 03-07-103 |
Keywords: | design |
Posted-Date: | 21 Jul 2003 21:32:24 EDT |
"Pete Gray" <petegray@ieee.org> wrote in message
> I'm about to embark on a project to produce a microcontroller-centric,
> target-neutral programming language.
> I'd like to hear views regarding the pros and cons of Industry or Academic
> sponsorship versus the Open Source approach.
Why is this a good idea? Surely abstracting machine word lengths,
byte ordering and access to onboard peripherals will only increase
execution times and executable code footprints? Small, fast
executable code and microcontrollers go hand in hand.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.