Re: Kannapinn in a Nutshell

Joachim Durchholz <joachim.durchholz@web.de>
20 Jun 2003 00:14:35 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Kannapinn in a Nutshell joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-04-27)
Re: Kannapinn in a Nutshell soenke.kannapinn@wincor-nixdorf.com (=?Windows-1252?Q?S=F6nke_Kannapinn?=) (2003-05-06)
Re: Kannapinn in a Nutshell cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2003-05-06)
Re: Kannapinn in a Nutshell cdc@maxnet.co.nz (Carl Cerecke) (2003-05-13)
Re: Kannapinn in a Nutshell soenke.kannapinn@wincor-nixdorf.com (=?Windows-1252?Q?S=F6nke_Kannapinn?=) (2003-05-14)
Re: Kannapinn in a Nutshell soenke.kannapinn@wincor-nixdorf.com (=?Windows-1252?Q?S=F6nke_Kannapinn?=) (2003-05-16)
Re: Kannapinn in a Nutshell joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-06-20)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Joachim Durchholz <joachim.durchholz@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 20 Jun 2003 00:14:35 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 03-04-075 03-05-014
Keywords: summary
Posted-Date: 20 Jun 2003 00:14:35 EDT

Sönke Kannapinn wrote:
>
> Joachim, can you point me to what you believe to be erroneous? (Post
> it to comp.compilers if you feel that others should profit.)


To correct impressions, Sönke and me have discussed the issue in private
and found that I was reading that specific part of the paper under wrong
assumptions.


Regards,
Jo

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.