Related articles |
---|
[4 earlier articles] |
Re: Making a partial C compiler idbaxter@semdesigns.com (2003-05-24) |
Re: Making a partial C compiler cyberheg@l115.langkaer.dk (John Eskie) (2003-05-29) |
Re: Making a partial C compiler vbdis@aol.com (2003-06-03) |
Re: Making a partial C compiler lars@bearnip.com (2003-06-03) |
Re: Making a partial C compiler boldyrev@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru (Ivan Boldyrev) (2003-06-03) |
Re: Making a partial C compiler jyrixx@astro.temple.edu (2003-06-03) |
Re: Making a partial C compiler torbenm@diku.dk (2003-06-05) |
Re: Making a partial C compiler cyberheg@l115.langkaer.dk (John Eskie) (2003-06-08) |
Re: Making a partial C compiler cyberheg@l115.langkaer.dk (John Eskie) (2003-06-08) |
Re: Making a partial C compiler vbdis@aol.com (2003-06-20) |
From: | torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ęgidius Mogensen) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 5 Jun 2003 22:53:48 -0400 |
Organization: | Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen |
References: | 03-05-202 03-06-008 |
Keywords: | code |
Posted-Date: | 05 Jun 2003 22:53:48 EDT |
As for code obfuscation, the most effective way I can imagine is to
write your program in Haskell, use GHC (the Glasgow Haskell Compiler)
to produce C and distribute that (in compiled or source form). Few
people will be able to make any kind of sense out of that!
Furthermore, you gain the advantage of faster development that using a
high-level language provides.
Torben Mogensen
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.