Related articles |
---|
Grammar to automation translation at runtime (NOT at compile time)? sarkar_soumen@yahoo.com (2003-05-14) |
Re: Grammar to automation translation at runtime (NOT at compile t vbdis@aol.com (2003-05-18) |
Re: Grammar to automation translation at runtime (NOT at compile t codeworker@free.fr (2003-05-18) |
Re: Grammar to automation translation at runtime (NOT at compile t oliver@zeigermann.de (Oliver Zeigermann) (2003-05-18) |
From: | vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 18 May 2003 23:52:41 -0400 |
Organization: | AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com |
References: | 03-05-085 |
Keywords: | parse, dynamic |
Posted-Date: | 18 May 2003 23:52:41 EDT |
sarkar_soumen@yahoo.com (Soumen Sarkar) schreibt:
>Therefore, my question is if there is any thought/effort to make the
>grammar to automation (a computational service) make available at run
>time?
I'm thinking about such a thing myself, inspired by MetaS. In several
of my applications I'd appreciate some scripting feature, based upon a
grammar which can be input on the fly, from either manual input or a
text file.
It's no special problem to create automation tables at runtime, but
how to add actions to these tables? Once a grammar is customized with
actions, it's very hard to propagate eventual changes in the syntax to
all those customized grammars :-(
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.