Re: Dynamic compiling

nicolas_capens@hotmail.com (c0d1f1ed)
16 May 2003 21:53:50 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[8 earlier articles]
Re: Dynamic compiling rossb@audiomulch.com (Ross Bencina) (2003-05-14)
Re: Dynamic compiling fjh@students.cs.mu.OZ.AU (2003-05-14)
Re: Dynamic compiling crwfrd@umich.edu (Randolph Crawford) (2003-05-15)
Re: Dynamic compiling hpc@NOSPAM.prism.uvsq.fr (Henri-Pierre CHARLES) (2003-05-16)
Re: Dynamic compiling nworth@earthlink.net (Norman Worth) (2003-05-16)
Re: Dynamic compiling firefly@diku.dk (Peter \Firefly\Lund) (2003-05-16)
Re: Dynamic compiling nicolas_capens@hotmail.com (2003-05-16)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: nicolas_capens@hotmail.com (c0d1f1ed)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 16 May 2003 21:53:50 -0400
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
References: 03-05-031 03-05-050
Keywords: dynamic, assembler
Posted-Date: 16 May 2003 21:53:50 EDT

If performance is most important, you might want to generate code for
x86 instructions directly. My run-time assembler SoftWire does exactly
this: http://softwire.sourceforge.net. I've added automatic register
allocation yesterday which makes it almost like intermediate code.
I've used it very successfully in my swShader project:
http://sw-shader.sourceforge.net.

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.