Related articles |
---|
[6 earlier articles] |
Re: Dynamic compiling thant@acm.org (Thant Tessman) (2003-05-12) |
Re: Dynamic compiling boldyrev+nospam@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru (Ivan Boldyrev) (2003-05-13) |
Re: Dynamic compiling rossb@audiomulch.com (Ross Bencina) (2003-05-14) |
Re: Dynamic compiling fjh@students.cs.mu.OZ.AU (2003-05-14) |
Re: Dynamic compiling crwfrd@umich.edu (Randolph Crawford) (2003-05-15) |
Re: Dynamic compiling hpc@NOSPAM.prism.uvsq.fr (Henri-Pierre CHARLES) (2003-05-16) |
Re: Dynamic compiling nworth@earthlink.net (Norman Worth) (2003-05-16) |
Re: Dynamic compiling firefly@diku.dk (Peter \Firefly\Lund) (2003-05-16) |
Re: Dynamic compiling nicolas_capens@hotmail.com (2003-05-16) |
From: | "Norman Worth" <nworth@earthlink.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 16 May 2003 21:51:39 -0400 |
Organization: | EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net |
References: | 03-05-031 |
Keywords: | dynamic |
Posted-Date: | 16 May 2003 21:51:39 EDT |
Scheme, lisp, and Java have been mentioned. Tcl is also frequently
used. It's a byte code compiler like Visual Basic, but it's small.
You can also use its tk interface to do windows stuff. There are some
embedded versions of Basic that should also be adaptable.
"David" <davidslask@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> Hi, I am looking for a small efficient free/opensource compiler to
> integrate into my program. it should allow you to compile directly
> into memory, then execute the code directly from memory. Primary
> target is Windows(Intel), but support for other platforms would be
> nice.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.