Re: Dynamic compiling

"Norman Worth" <nworth@earthlink.net>
16 May 2003 21:51:39 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[6 earlier articles]
Re: Dynamic compiling thant@acm.org (Thant Tessman) (2003-05-12)
Re: Dynamic compiling boldyrev+nospam@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru (Ivan Boldyrev) (2003-05-13)
Re: Dynamic compiling rossb@audiomulch.com (Ross Bencina) (2003-05-14)
Re: Dynamic compiling fjh@students.cs.mu.OZ.AU (2003-05-14)
Re: Dynamic compiling crwfrd@umich.edu (Randolph Crawford) (2003-05-15)
Re: Dynamic compiling hpc@NOSPAM.prism.uvsq.fr (Henri-Pierre CHARLES) (2003-05-16)
Re: Dynamic compiling nworth@earthlink.net (Norman Worth) (2003-05-16)
Re: Dynamic compiling firefly@diku.dk (Peter \Firefly\Lund) (2003-05-16)
Re: Dynamic compiling nicolas_capens@hotmail.com (2003-05-16)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: "Norman Worth" <nworth@earthlink.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 16 May 2003 21:51:39 -0400
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
References: 03-05-031
Keywords: dynamic
Posted-Date: 16 May 2003 21:51:39 EDT

Scheme, lisp, and Java have been mentioned. Tcl is also frequently
used. It's a byte code compiler like Visual Basic, but it's small.
You can also use its tk interface to do windows stuff. There are some
embedded versions of Basic that should also be adaptable.


"David" <davidslask@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> Hi, I am looking for a small efficient free/opensource compiler to
> integrate into my program. it should allow you to compile directly
> into memory, then execute the code directly from memory. Primary
> target is Windows(Intel), but support for other platforms would be
> nice.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.