Re: simple vs complex languages

Terrence Enger <tenger@iSeries-guru.com>
16 May 2003 20:03:32 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[15 earlier articles]
Re: simple vs complex languages bear@sonic.net (2003-05-12)
Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-05-14)
Re: simple vs complex languages bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2003-05-15)
Re: simple vs complex languages lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2003-05-15)
Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-05-16)
Re: simple vs complex languages dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2003-05-16)
Re: simple vs complex languages tenger@iSeries-guru.com (Terrence Enger) (2003-05-16)
Re: simple vs complex languages alexc@std.com (Alex Colvin) (2003-05-16)
Re: simple vs complex languages eas-lab@absamail.co.za (2003-05-18)
Re: simple vs complex languages jcrens@earthlink.net (Jack Crenshaw) (2003-05-24)
Re: simple vs complex languages jcrens@earthlink.net (Jack Crenshaw) (2003-05-24)
Re: simple vs complex languages jcrens@earthlink.net (Jack Crenshaw) (2003-05-24)
Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-05-29)
[17 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Terrence Enger <tenger@iSeries-guru.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 16 May 2003 20:03:32 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 03-04-095 03-04-112 03-05-006 03-05-067
Keywords: design
Posted-Date: 16 May 2003 20:03:32 EDT

bear@sonic.net wrote:
[snip]


> So far, source code for a given program has a history of
> lasting, usually, far longer than either HTML versions or editor
> versions.


There is an exercise that I like to do before handing completed coding
work off to the next step in whatever development process my customer
uses. This is to compare my work order to the output of a diff tool
on my source code. Basically, I try to match them up: here is what
they asked for, and here is what I did about it. (If you will believe
that I never find something that doesn't match, I can make you a great
deal on a fine bridge in Brooklyn (slightly used, you pay shipping).)


This works best if there is identifiable *code*. It is easy to say
that other programming paradigms could provide comparable assistance,
but it is harder to imagine just what form that assistance would take.
Besides, IBM's iSeries already has CMPPFM, lots of systems already
have `cvs diff`, and so forth.


Just my C$0.02.


Terry.
Available for contract programming.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.