Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| [4 earlier articles] |
| Re: simple vs complex languages rafe@cs.mu.oz.au (2003-05-05) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages hat@se-46.wpa.wtb.tue.nl (Albert Hofkamp) (2003-05-06) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages Robert@Knighten.org (2003-05-06) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages scott.moore6@attbi.com (Scott Moore) (2003-05-06) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages tmk@netvision.net.il (2003-05-06) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-05-12) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages George.Russell@cis.strath.ac.uk (George Richard Russell) (2003-05-12) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages torbenm@diku.dk (2003-05-12) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages spencer@panix.com (David Spencer) (2003-05-12) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages thant@acm.org (Thant Tessman) (2003-05-12) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages bear@sonic.net (2003-05-12) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages bear@sonic.net (2003-05-12) |
| Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-05-14) |
| [28 later articles] |
| From: | George Richard Russell <George.Russell@cis.strath.ac.uk> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 12 May 2003 01:31:59 -0400 |
| Organization: | Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde |
| References: | 03-04-095 03-04-112 03-05-006 |
| Keywords: | design, visual |
| Posted-Date: | 12 May 2003 01:31:59 EDT |
> Perhaps also researching on newer forms (hypertexts, fancy editors) of
> source program is not fancy enough for academics (or for funding). I
> still find it a pity.
The ProcessBase system from the St Andrews University does this, with
hyperlinks between source text and objects within a persistent
programming environment.
See
http://www-ppg.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/Languages/ProcessBase/HyperCode/
http://www-ppg.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/Languages/Java/HCS/
George Russell
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.