Related articles |
---|
Do most embeded OS and related compilers contains a mechanism like __t gramon@163.com (2003-03-22) |
Re: Do most embeded OS and related compilers contains a mechanism like fjh@students.cs.mu.OZ.AU (2003-03-30) |
Re: Do most embeded OS and related compilers contains a mechanism like alex_mcd@btopenworld.com (Alex McDonald) (2003-03-30) |
Re: Do most embeded OS and related compilers contains a mechanism li jvorbrueggen@mediasec.de (Jan C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vorbr=FCggen?=) (2003-03-31) |
Re: Do most embeded OS and related compilers contains a mechanism alex_mcd@btopenworld.com (Alex McDonald) (2003-04-05) |
From: | "Alex McDonald" <alex_mcd@btopenworld.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 5 Apr 2003 14:48:24 -0500 |
Organization: | BT Openworld |
References: | 03-03-135 03-03-166 03-03-188 03-03-200 |
Keywords: | errors |
Posted-Date: | 05 Apr 2003 14:48:24 EST |
> > Win32 provides a pretty sophisticated mechanism for exception handling
> > that are setjmp/longjmp-less, and can be used by any compiler that
> > cares to implement it.
>
> I'll presume the deisgn is taken straight from VMS?
> [Slug that one out off-line, please, at let us know who won. -John]
No argument. Yes, Cutler's influence, called the condition handling facility
in VMS.
--
Regards
Alex McDonald
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.