Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction

lars@bearnip.com (Lars Duening)
14 Mar 2003 11:05:24 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
.NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction david.cornelson@iflibrary.com (David A. Cornelson) (2003-02-21)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2003-02-24)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction neelk@alum.mit.edu (Neelakantan Krishnaswami) (2003-02-24)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction david.cornelson@iflibrary.com (David A. Cornelson) (2003-03-09)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction tbandrow@unitedsoftworks.com (2003-03-09)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction neelk@alum.mit.edu (Neelakantan Krishnaswami) (2003-03-14)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction lars@bearnip.com (2003-03-14)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction david.cornelson@iflibrary.com (David A. Cornelson) (2003-03-14)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2003-03-14)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction tbandrow@unitedsoftworks.com (2003-03-16)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction tbandrow@unitedsoftworks.com (2003-03-16)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2003-03-17)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction david.cornelson@iflibrary.com (David A. Cornelson) (2003-03-17)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: lars@bearnip.com (Lars Duening)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 14 Mar 2003 11:05:24 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 03-02-125 03-02-145 03-03-033
Keywords: design
Posted-Date: 14 Mar 2003 11:05:24 EST

David A. Cornelson <david.cornelson@iflibrary.com> wrote:


> I have thoroughly looked at the mud world and found it lacking in
> flexibility and extensibility.


The maintainers of the drivers (I'm one of them) would certainly welcome
suggestions on how to make their drivers more flexible and extensible.
It's hard to please an audience if the audience never expresses its
wishes.


> From there, I want to open the genre to extensions like database, socket
> programming, xml, and other types of features that platforms like Java and
> ..NET have.


I would suggest to take a closer look at Python or Ruby as well.

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.