Tarski's fixpoint theorem and static analysis -- reference?

John Fiskio-Lasseter <johnfl@cs.uoregon.edu>
24 Feb 2003 18:04:26 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Tarski's fixpoint theorem and static analysis -- reference? johnfl@cs.uoregon.edu (John Fiskio-Lasseter) (2003-02-24)
Re: Tarski's fixpoint theorem and static analysis -- reference? Jens_Kilian@agilent.com (Jens Kilian) (2003-03-09)
Re: Tarski's fixpoint theorem and static analysis -- reference? chase@theworld.com (David Chase) (2003-03-09)
Re: Tarski's fixpoint theorem and static analysis -- reference? andrews@csd.uwo.ca (2003-03-14)
Re: Tarski's fixpoint theorem and static analysis -- reference? johnfl@cs.uoregon.edu (John Fiskio-Lasseter) (2003-03-17)
Re: Tarski's fixpoint theorem and static analysis -- reference? steck@stecksoft.com (Paul A. Steckler) (2003-03-23)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: John Fiskio-Lasseter <johnfl@cs.uoregon.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.compilers
Date: 24 Feb 2003 18:04:26 -0500
Organization: University of Oregon Computer Science Department
Keywords: theory, analysis, question
Posted-Date: 24 Feb 2003 18:04:26 EST

I'm curious to know the earliest paper that identifies Tarski's theorem
regarding the existence of least/greatest fixpoints of monotonic
functions on a complete lattice ("A Lattice Theoretical Fixpoint
Theorem and its Applications", Pacific J. of Math. 5, 285-309, 1955) as
the basis for termination of the standard dataflow analysis algorithms.


None of the "classical" data flow works I've read (Killdall '73, Kam &
Ullman '76, Kam & Ullman '77, Hecht '77) cite this paper, nor any of
the compilers textbooks Ive seen (the dragon book, Fischer & LeBlanc,
Muchnick's _Advanced Compiler Design_).


It is, however, given an appendix' worth of summary in the recent
_Principles of Program Analysis_ textbook by Nielson, Nielson, &
Hankin, suggesting to me that his relevance was identified by the
abstract interpretation community. Indeed, the earliest citation of
Tarski's paper that I've seen (within the static analysis community) is
the Cousots' original abstract interpretation paper from POPL 77, and
they later published a constructive proof of Tarksi's theorem, also in
the Pacific Journal of Mathematics [82(1), 1979].


Were they the first ones to observe the relevance of Tarski's theorem
to static analysis, or is there an earlier paper that cites him?


Thanks,
John
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John Fiskio-Lasseter
    * Phd. Student, CIS Dept., University of Oregon
    * Deschutes 234 x6-1385 johnfl@cs.uoregon.edu


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.