Related articles |
---|
[7 earlier articles] |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? firefly@diku.dk (Peter Finderup Lund) (2003-02-21) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2003-02-21) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? jplevyak@yahoo.com (John Plevyak) (2003-02-21) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? {spamtrap}@qeng-ho.org (Arthur Chance) (2003-02-24) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (Glen Herrmannsfeldt) (2003-02-24) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? alexc@std.com (Alex Colvin) (2003-02-24) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? vbdis@aol.com (2003-02-24) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? firefly@diku.dk (Peter Finderup Lund) (2003-03-09) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-03-09) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? klimas@klimas-consulting.com (Andreas Klimas) (2003-03-09) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? bonzini@gnu.org (2003-03-14) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? jcrens@earthlink.net (Jack Crenshaw) (2003-03-14) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? david.thompson1@worldnet.att.net (David Thompson) (2003-03-22) |
[3 later articles] |
From: | vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 24 Feb 2003 17:37:57 -0500 |
Organization: | AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com |
References: | 03-02-098 |
Keywords: | performance, architecture |
Posted-Date: | 24 Feb 2003 17:37:57 EST |
Joachim Durchholz <joachim_d@gmx.de> schreibt:
>I then
>inlined the system code, making the CPU wait 80% of the time...
The Atari ST perhaps is not a good example, due to the bad compiler used for
the kernel ROMs. A simple recompile of the system, using an better compiler,
could have similar effects. Do you remember KAOS, the manually optimized ST
kernel?
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.